Differentiating Fixed Income Performance with Portable Alpha

Sep 20th, 2006 | Filed under: Portable Alpha & Alpha/Beta Separation | By: Alpha Male
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Yahoo! Buzz

By: Joseph F. Benning, The Chicago Board of Trade
Published: July 2006, AIMA Journal
Excerpts:

“Plan sponsors can disaggregate the returns of fully funded investments into alpha and beta components to better align investment objectives with a manager’s performance. But implementation is easier said than done.”

“While the tools for replicating equity beta exposure have been readily available for some time, the task of efficiently replicating generalized fixed-income exposure has been more problematic.”.

“Active trading of fixed-income based ETF’s is picking up steam, but those instruments tend to be narrow-based, representing sectors of fixed income markets, rather than the market as a whole. In addition, fixed-income sector indices carry implicit idiosyncratic risk related to the behavior of the yield curve.”

“Isolating alpha from beta within a strategy or asset class and then neutralising it requires a fair degree of sophistication.”

Read Full Article

 

Related Posts

  1. More on fixed income portable alpha
  2. Fixed income 130/30 produces “Pru Alpha” (that’s not a typo)
  3. High-Octane Fixed Income – Refining Absolute Returns from Active Strategies
  4. Fixed Income: A return to the glory days of yesteryear?
  5. Fixed Income 130/30 comes out of hiding

Leave Comment