<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GTAA Morphs into Hedge Fund Space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/11/14/gtaa-morphs-into-hedge-fund-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/11/14/gtaa-morphs-into-hedge-fund-space/</link>
	<description>A finance blog about hedge funds, portable alpha and alternative investing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: All About Alpha &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Janus: The Roman god of alpha/beta separation?</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/11/14/gtaa-morphs-into-hedge-fund-space/comment-page-1/#comment-3144</link>
		<dc:creator>All About Alpha &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Janus: The Roman god of alpha/beta separation?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/11/14/gtaa-morphs-into-hedge-fund-space/#comment-3144</guid>
		<description>[...] As you can see, this is really a half-step toward a pure alpha/beta approach.Ã‚  For example, the &#8220;Alpha&#8221; bucket actually contains a lot of beta simply because it includes active long-only managers.Ã‚  The portfolio construction process would therefore need to under-invest in &#8220;core&#8221; or risk having too much beta.Ã‚  It seems the &#8220;alternative&#8221; bucket can better be described as &#8220;alpha&#8221;.Ã‚  &#8220;Tactical&#8221; can be either high-alpha or low-alpha depending on the net market exposure.Ã‚  GTAA managers who have parceled off their active overlays into global macro-funds would be the first to say that trading beta can produceÃ‚ pure alpha as long asÃ‚ the portfolio remains market-neutral.Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As you can see, this is really a half-step toward a pure alpha/beta approach.Ã‚  For example, the &#8220;Alpha&#8221; bucket actually contains a lot of beta simply because it includes active long-only managers.Ã‚  The portfolio construction process would therefore need to under-invest in &#8220;core&#8221; or risk having too much beta.Ã‚  It seems the &#8220;alternative&#8221; bucket can better be described as &#8220;alpha&#8221;.Ã‚  &#8220;Tactical&#8221; can be either high-alpha or low-alpha depending on the net market exposure.Ã‚  GTAA managers who have parceled off their active overlays into global macro-funds would be the first to say that trading beta can produceÃ‚ pure alpha as long asÃ‚ the portfolio remains market-neutral.Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

