<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is 130/30 Always &#8220;High Conviction&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/07/25/is-13030-always-high-conviction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/07/25/is-13030-always-high-conviction/</link>
	<description>A finance blog about hedge funds, portable alpha and alternative investing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Risk management and high conviction investing &#171; Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/07/25/is-13030-always-high-conviction/comment-page-1/#comment-15956</link>
		<dc:creator>Risk management and high conviction investing &#171; Abnormal Returns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/07/25/is-13030-always-high-conviction/#comment-15956</guid>
		<description>[...] 130/30-type funds have become popular in that they are designed to allow institutional investors to have greater latitude to implement security selection while maintaining a (relatively) constrained risk profile. This is in contrast with many hedge funds where risk parameters are entirely less rigid. The always excellent All About Alpha blog has a post up on the question of whether 130/30 or 1X0/X0 funds are really and truly &#8220;high conviction&#8221; investment vehicles.Ã‚  As they write: Therefore, if youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re looking for a concentrated fund, donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t assume that 130/30 fund necessarily fits the bill. In the end, a particular 1X0/X0 strategy might not actually be Ã¢â‚¬high convictionÃ¢â‚¬ at all. The irony is that 1X0/X0 strategies actually represent a way for managers to express more of their beliefs, not to necessarily express those same beliefs with a Ã¢â‚¬Å“higher convictionÃ¢â‚¬. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 130/30-type funds have become popular in that they are designed to allow institutional investors to have greater latitude to implement security selection while maintaining a (relatively) constrained risk profile. This is in contrast with many hedge funds where risk parameters are entirely less rigid. The always excellent All About Alpha blog has a post up on the question of whether 130/30 or 1X0/X0 funds are really and truly &#8220;high conviction&#8221; investment vehicles.Ã‚  As they write: Therefore, if youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re looking for a concentrated fund, donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t assume that 130/30 fund necessarily fits the bill. In the end, a particular 1X0/X0 strategy might not actually be Ã¢â‚¬high convictionÃ¢â‚¬ at all. The irony is that 1X0/X0 strategies actually represent a way for managers to express more of their beliefs, not to necessarily express those same beliefs with a Ã¢â‚¬Å“higher convictionÃ¢â‚¬. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

