<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Note to Cambridge Retirement Board: Good luck with that RFP&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/09/20/note-to-cambridge-retirement-board-good-luck-with-that-rfp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/09/20/note-to-cambridge-retirement-board-good-luck-with-that-rfp/</link>
	<description>A finance blog about hedge funds, portable alpha and alternative investing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Chiappinelli</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/09/20/note-to-cambridge-retirement-board-good-luck-with-that-rfp/comment-page-1/#comment-35111</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Chiappinelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/09/20/note-to-cambridge-retirement-board-good-luck-with-that-rfp/#comment-35111</guid>
		<description>One of the reasons for the lack of strategies included in eVestment is that they had traditionally added new products to a universe after a year&#039;s worth of performance had been captured. I pointed out that, while appropriate to wait a year for new products in established asset classes, it might be helpful for plan sponsors to see all of the new products in this asset class regardless of length of track record. Batterymarch&#039;s 130/30 started 12/31/06, and has now been added to the universe. I believe eVest will loosen the 1 yr. requirement for 130/30 going forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the reasons for the lack of strategies included in eVestment is that they had traditionally added new products to a universe after a year&#8217;s worth of performance had been captured. I pointed out that, while appropriate to wait a year for new products in established asset classes, it might be helpful for plan sponsors to see all of the new products in this asset class regardless of length of track record. Batterymarch&#8217;s 130/30 started 12/31/06, and has now been added to the universe. I believe eVest will loosen the 1 yr. requirement for 130/30 going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

