<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Morningstar finally puts on shorts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/09/28/update-morningstar-finally-puts-on-shorts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/09/28/update-morningstar-finally-puts-on-shorts/</link>
	<description>A finance blog about hedge funds, portable alpha and alternative investing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Compson</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/09/28/update-morningstar-finally-puts-on-shorts/comment-page-1/#comment-30791</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Compson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/09/28/update-morningstar-finally-puts-on-shorts/#comment-30791</guid>
		<description>Morningstar may have shorts, but they don&#039;t know how to analyze them.  This week&#039;s Investment News article &quot;Pride of the Quants&quot; quotes a Morningstar analyst saying, &quot;130/30 funds were able to maneuver through August volatility unscathed.&quot; Why? Because they were flat for the month?  Given that these products have an average beta of 1.0 to the S&amp;P 500, that means the &quot;30/30 part&quot; was DOWN 5% for the month! Hardly &quot;maneuvering unscathed&quot; and much worse than market neutral funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morningstar may have shorts, but they don&#8217;t know how to analyze them.  This week&#8217;s Investment News article &#8220;Pride of the Quants&#8221; quotes a Morningstar analyst saying, &#8220;130/30 funds were able to maneuver through August volatility unscathed.&#8221; Why? Because they were flat for the month?  Given that these products have an average beta of 1.0 to the S&amp;P 500, that means the &#8220;30/30 part&#8221; was DOWN 5% for the month! Hardly &#8220;maneuvering unscathed&#8221; and much worse than market neutral funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

