<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now &#8220;Private Equity Replication&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/12/17/now-private-equity-replication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/12/17/now-private-equity-replication/</link>
	<description>A finance blog about hedge funds, portable alpha and alternative investing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Walt French</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/12/17/now-private-equity-replication/comment-page-1/#comment-119359</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/12/17/now-private-equity-replication/#comment-119359</guid>
		<description>A second valuable use of an index is to see how much of any single fund&#039;s idiosyncratic risk actually has any return associated with it. Just as comparing an equity mutual fund to an index lets one see whether the fund&#039;s idiosyncratic returns have a positive or (the typical case) negative average return (net of fees).

So, a PE fund that actually is adding value to a levered equity strategy in similar stocks should WELCOME the comparison. Those who make bad bets, or wring out huge expenses from their investors are the ones you&#039;ll hear squawking the loudest about how irrelevant the replication is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A second valuable use of an index is to see how much of any single fund&#8217;s idiosyncratic risk actually has any return associated with it. Just as comparing an equity mutual fund to an index lets one see whether the fund&#8217;s idiosyncratic returns have a positive or (the typical case) negative average return (net of fees).</p>
<p>So, a PE fund that actually is adding value to a levered equity strategy in similar stocks should WELCOME the comparison. Those who make bad bets, or wring out huge expenses from their investors are the ones you&#8217;ll hear squawking the loudest about how irrelevant the replication is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday links: share count shrinkage &#171; Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/12/17/now-private-equity-replication/comment-page-1/#comment-63386</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday links: share count shrinkage &#171; Abnormal Returns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/12/17/now-private-equity-replication/#comment-63386</guid>
		<description>[...] Forget hedge fund replication, is it now time for private equity replication? (All About Alpha) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Forget hedge fund replication, is it now time for private equity replication? (All About Alpha) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

