Study aims to shed light on “darkness” in hedge fund databases

Jan 5th, 2010 | Filed under: Academic Research, Performance, Analytics & Metrics, Today's Post | By: Alpha Male
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Yahoo! Buzz

outofthedarkThe voluntary nature of hedge fund reporting has made many commentators see hedge fund indices and, by extension, hedge fund industry performance, with a somewhat jaundiced eye.  Since hedge fund databases are designed as surreptitious marketing vehicles for hedge funds, the worst performing funds are likely to be absent from the indices.

But others counter that the best performing funds are also likely to abstain from voluntary reporting since they believe it might be viewed as kind of tacky by its rarefied clientele. More…


To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.

Related Posts

  1. Only 3% of Hedge Funds in All Five Major Databases
  2. Study examines “mulligans” in hedge fund performance data
  3. Efforts to Shed Light on High Frequency Trading
  4. Hedge fund databases capture 61% more funds than last year
  5. Hedge Fund Indices: Seeing the industry through a prism

Leave Comment