<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New study of mutual fund alpha shows that what-goes-around-comes-around</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2010/01/27/new-study-of-mutual-fund-alpha-shows-that-what-goes-around-comes-around/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2010/01/27/new-study-of-mutual-fund-alpha-shows-that-what-goes-around-comes-around/</link>
	<description>A finance blog about hedge funds, portable alpha and alternative investing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Brakke</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2010/01/27/new-study-of-mutual-fund-alpha-shows-that-what-goes-around-comes-around/comment-page-1/#comment-234720</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Brakke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/?p=9022#comment-234720</guid>
		<description>This phrase jumped out at me: &quot;They also find that the ratio of &#039;skilled to unskilled&#039; funds (think ratio of high-tracking error funds to index huggers) . . .&quot;  
 
I&#039;ve been watching this as it relates to the marketing of products.  The &quot;tracking error is bad&quot; theme is still pretty entrenched overall at the advisor level (and for &quot;unsophisticated&quot; clients), but it pops up in a lot of ways and places that you wouldn&#039;t expect even among &quot;sophisticated&quot; clients.
 
It will be interesting to see whether that philosophy changes over time across the business, and whether instead of using a screen that includes a maximum on tracking error people will start with a notion of a minimum threshold below which it&#039;s not worth looking.
 
Tom Brakke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This phrase jumped out at me: &#8220;They also find that the ratio of &#8217;skilled to unskilled&#8217; funds (think ratio of high-tracking error funds to index huggers) . . .&#8221;  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been watching this as it relates to the marketing of products.  The &#8220;tracking error is bad&#8221; theme is still pretty entrenched overall at the advisor level (and for &#8220;unsophisticated&#8221; clients), but it pops up in a lot of ways and places that you wouldn&#8217;t expect even among &#8220;sophisticated&#8221; clients.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see whether that philosophy changes over time across the business, and whether instead of using a screen that includes a maximum on tracking error people will start with a notion of a minimum threshold below which it&#8217;s not worth looking.</p>
<p>Tom Brakke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

